βF-I-L-Mβ
"Strands" - a New York Times word game
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #611
βF-I-L-Mβ










βF-I-L-Mβ
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #612
βThe butterfly effectβ






βThe butterfly effectβ
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #612
βThe butterfly effectβ






βThe butterfly effectβ
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
I was afraid these would all be US-specific clues but, fortunately, that wasn't the case. One of them I had no idea about, however so had to go with process of elim.
Strands #613
β___ Cityβ








Strands #613
β___ Cityβ
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Bit esoteric today for those outside a certain geographic area (not New York City). One of the answers I didn't even realise fit the category.
Strands #614
βEncuentra el ritmoβ







Strands #614
βEncuentra el ritmoβ
Last edited by Mikey on Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Indeed. I got lost in the wilderness, breaking my goal of "never" taking a hintMikey wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:27 pm Bit esoteric today for those outside a certain geographic area (not New York City). One of the answers I didn't even realise fit the category.
Strands #614
βEncuentra el ritmoβ
![]()
Strands #614
βEncuentra el ritmoβ
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Fortunately I have a friend in Honduras who loathes it or I wouldn't even have heard of it. Hope that's not a spoiler.
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #615
βKnock, knock!β







βKnock, knock!β
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Crashed and burned on this one
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #616
βHow enchanting!β





Oh... it was that kind of "enchanting".
βHow enchanting!β
Oh... it was that kind of "enchanting".
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Milestone: -
.
.
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Solving today's puzzle was as routine as the theme suggested.
Strands #617
βA case of the Mondaysβ






Strands #617
βA case of the Mondaysβ
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
I needed a hint for the Spangram. I got the first half but the rest was beyond me. I thought it was supposed to be a general category name, not an example.
Strands #618
βAesop's animalsβ









Strands #618
βAesop's animalsβ
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #620
βOut, damned spot!β








βOut, damned spot!β
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #620
βOut, damned spot!β









βOut, damned spot!β
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #621
βLow-key elusiveβ






βLow-key elusiveβ
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Very "elusive" so far
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #622
βWe can see right through themβ






βWe can see right through themβ
_______________
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
βWe should not only write so that it is possible for the reader to understand us, but so that it is impossible for them to misunderstand us.β -- Quintilian
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #622
βWe can see right through themβ






PS had to use at least one hint in the "elusive" one
βWe can see right through themβ
PS had to use at least one hint in the "elusive" one
-
GBO Possum
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:35 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
Re: "Strands" - a New York Times word game
Strands #623
βAround it goesβ







My first choices all had a common characteristic, which narrowed my mind and made later words less obvious. It was fun
βAround it goesβ
My first choices all had a common characteristic, which narrowed my mind and made later words less obvious. It was fun